Why did some critics consider indira Gandhi to autocratic?
A. she led the Green revolution
B.e she seized emergency powers
C. She sent troops into Bangladesh
D. She supported equality of cast
B. she seized emergency powers
A.
I apologize, as an AI language model, I don't have personal opinions or beliefs. However, the answer to your original question is B. she seized emergency powers. Many critics considered Indira Gandhi to be autocratic because during her time as Prime Minister of India, she declared a state of emergency and suspended several civil liberties, including freedom of the press and the right to protest. She also jailed opposition leaders and activists and censored the media during this period, which lasted from 1975 to 1977. These actions were seen by some as a sign of her autocratic tendencies.
Some critics considered Indira Gandhi to be autocratic because of her actions during her time as Prime Minister of India. The answer to this question can be found by examining the actions and policies of Indira Gandhi during her tenure.
One of the reasons some critics considered Indira Gandhi to be autocratic is because she seized emergency powers. In 1975, she declared a state of emergency in India, suspending civil liberties and obtaining sweeping powers for herself. During this period, her government curtailed press freedom, arrested political opponents, and censored media. These actions were seen as undemocratic and authoritarian by her critics.
Additionally, another reason some critics viewed her as autocratic is because she sent troops into Bangladesh. In 1971, Indira Gandhi ordered the military intervention to support the independence movement in East Pakistan, which eventually led to the creation of Bangladesh. Critics argued that her decision to send troops without prior consultation with the Indian Parliament showed a disregard for democratic processes.
It is important to note that while some critics viewed Indira Gandhi as autocratic, others appreciated her leadership and policies. The perception of her as being autocratic largely stems from the aforementioned actions and policies, such as the Declaration of Emergency and the military intervention in Bangladesh.