With such huge increases in population, why has there not been a direct and equivalent increase in urban development (i.e., why is it such a small proportion of habitable land use)?
*
1 point
Many people can live in small spaces, such as high rises in cities.
There is not enough habitable land left for further urban development.
People want to live close to where they work, which is usually the city or suburbs.
Habitable land is already being used for livestock and crops.
There are a few potential answers to this question, but the most likely is that there is simply not enough habitable land left for further urban development. As cities grow and expand, they often spread outwards into surrounding areas, which can lead to issues with land use and declining natural environments. Additionally, many people want to live close to where they work, which often means living in urban or suburban areas. Finally, it's also worth noting that many people can live in small spaces, such as high-rise apartments, which can help to make urban areas more densely populated without requiring as much land.
chooes one chooes
The most likely answer is that there is not enough habitable land left for further urban development.
With such huge increases in population, why has there not been a direct and equivalent increase in urban development (i.e., why is it such a small proportion of habitable land use)?
*
1 point
A. Many people can live in small spaces, such as high rises in cities.
B. There is not enough habitable land left for further urban development.
C. People want to live close to where they work, which is usually the city or suburbs.
D. Habitable land is already being used for livestock and crops.
In order to answer this question, we need to consider the various factors that contribute to urban development and why it may not have kept pace with population growth. While population increases have indeed been significant, there are several reasons why urban development has not directly and proportionally increased:
1. Many people can live in small spaces, such as high rises in cities: Urban areas often prioritize vertical growth, with the construction of high-rise buildings or apartment complexes. This allows for a greater concentration of people within a limited land area. By building upwards rather than outwards, urban areas can accommodate larger populations without requiring significant increases in land use.
2. There is not enough habitable land left for further urban development: In some regions, particularly in densely populated areas or areas with geographic constraints (e.g., surrounded by mountains or oceans), there may be limited available land for further expansion of urban areas. Environmental factors, protected lands, or infrastructure limitations can also limit the availability of land for urban development.
3. People want to live close to where they work, which is usually the city or suburbs: Many people choose to live in or near urban areas where job opportunities, services, and amenities are more readily available. As a result, there is a natural tendency for population growth to be concentrated in existing urban areas, which may already be well-developed and have limited space for further expansion.
4. Habitable land is already being used for livestock and crops: Some habitable land may already be allocated for agricultural purposes, such as crop cultivation or livestock rearing. This can restrict the availability of land for urban development since agricultural activities are crucial for food production and supply.
In summary, the limited expansion of urban development in proportion to population increases can be attributed to factors such as high-density living, limited available land, preference for proximity to job opportunities, and the allocation of land for agricultural purposes. These factors collectively contribute to a smaller proportion of habitable land being utilized for urban development.