Use the texts Designed to Detain and In Their Own Words to answer the question.
Designed to Detain
In Their Own Words
How is Nick Friesen’s perspective in In Their Own Words different from the perspective in Designed to Detain?
(1 point)
Responses
He thought the food was bad.
He thought the food was bad.
He felt the guards asked too many questions.
He felt the guards asked too many questions.
He was very happy there.
He was very happy there.
He wanted to come to the United States
There is no clear answer to this question as both texts do not include Nick Friesen's perspective.
He was very happy there.
This response is not accurate as it does not answer the question of how Nick Friesen's perspective in In Their Own Words is different from the perspective in Designed to Detain.
To compare Nick Friesen's perspective in "In Their Own Words" with the perspective in "Designed to Detain," we will need to analyze both texts.
1. "In Their Own Words": In this text, Nick Friesen shares his personal experience of being detained at the border. It provides a first-hand account of his time in detention.
2. "Designed to Detain": This text outlines the purpose and conditions of detention centers at the border, presenting a more general perspective on the topic.
To compare their perspectives, we can look for differences in their attitudes, opinions, or experiences:
Based on the information provided, it is not possible to determine Nick Friesen's perspective in "In Their Own Words" as different from the perspective in "Designed to Detain." The responses provided do not indicate any distinguishable contrast or difference in perspectives.
To find the answer, you would need to read both texts in detail and identify any contrasting statements or experiences mentioned by Nick Friesen in "In Their Own Words" and the information presented in "Designed to Detain." Look for specific details or opinions that differentiate his experience from the general overview provided in "Designed to Detain."