Which of the following is NOT a reason trade thrived during the Roman empire?
*
1 point
The empire was not at war, so the lands were peaceful
The empire shared a language with all their trading partners
The navy ensured safe ocean travel and trade
The empire all had one currency
The empire all had one currency is NOT a reason trade thrived during the Roman empire.
are you sure?
Yes, I am sure. The fact that the Roman empire had a common currency facilitated trade within the empire, as it provided a stable and reliable means of exchange.
To determine which of the given options is NOT a reason trade thrived during the Roman Empire, let's analyze each option:
1. The empire was not at war, so the lands were peaceful.
Peaceful lands and stability are generally conducive to trade because they create a safe environment for merchants to conduct business and transport goods.
2. The empire shared a language with all their trading partners.
A shared language can be advantageous for trade as it facilitates communication and understanding between merchants, making it easier to negotiate and complete transactions.
3. The navy ensured safe ocean travel and trade.
A strong navy plays a crucial role in securing trade routes and protecting merchant ships from threats such as piracy or attacks. This helps to ensure the safety of ocean travel and facilitates trade.
4. The empire all had one currency.
Having a single currency across the empire simplifies trade by reducing the need for currency exchange or dealing with different exchange rates between regions.
Now, analyzing the given options in light of the question, we can conclude that the option "The empire all had one currency" is NOT a reason trade thrived during the Roman Empire. This is because a common currency actually promotes trade by facilitating commercial transactions and eliminating the complexities associated with multiple currencies. Therefore, this option stands out as the exception among the given reasons and is the answer to the question.