Which of the following BEST describes the opposing attitudes toward the peace movement?
A.
It was both celebrated for the effects of the movement’s activism and vilified for creating chaos.
B.
It was both chastised for the movement’s inability to affect change and celebrated for its ideals.
C.
It was both rewarded with the end of the war and punished through the justice system.
D.
It was both criticized for being naïve and welcomed for its inability to change the public's minds.
B. It was both chastised for the movement's inability to affect change and celebrated for its ideals.
B. It was both chastised for the movement’s inability to affect change and celebrated for its ideals.
To determine which answer best describes the opposing attitudes toward the peace movement, we need to analyze the provided options. Here is a breakdown of each option:
A. It was both celebrated for the effects of the movement’s activism and vilified for creating chaos.
This option suggests that the peace movement was appreciated for the changes it brought about but also criticized for causing chaos.
B. It was both chastised for the movement’s inability to affect change and celebrated for its ideals.
This option implies that the peace movement was criticized for its lack of impact on creating change but admired for its principles.
C. It was both rewarded with the end of the war and punished through the justice system.
This option suggests that the peace movement was both recognized for bringing about the end of the war and penalized through the legal system.
D. It was both criticized for being naïve and welcomed for its inability to change the public's minds.
This option implies that the peace movement was derided for its naivety while also being accepted for its inability to alter public opinion.
After considering all the options, it seems that option B best describes the opposing attitudes toward the peace movement. The peace movement was chastised for its lack of ability to effect change while also being celebrated for its principles.