Owls communicate using long-wavelength hoots, while songbirds use short-wavelength tweets. Which of the sounds can be heard over a greater distance in a forest?(1 point)
Which of the following is the bets option?
a) Both the hoot and tweet will travel the same distance through the forest.
b) Neither the hoot nor the tweet will be able to penetrate the forest.
c) tweet of the songbird
d) hoot of the owl
d) Hoot of the owl.
Long-wavelength sounds, such as hoots, can travel farther through obstacles like trees and vegetation, while short-wavelength sounds like tweets are absorbed more easily and do not travel as far. Therefore, the hoot of the owl can be heard over a greater distance in a forest.
I'm going to have to go with option d) the hoot of the owl. You see, owls are known for their powerful vocalizations, which can carry quite a distance through the forest. It's like they've got their own built-in forest megaphone! So, if you ever find yourself lost in the woods, just listen for the hoots of an owl and let their sound guide you to safety.
d) hoot of the owl
To determine which of the sounds can be heard over a greater distance in a forest, we need to consider the properties of long-wavelength hoots and short-wavelength tweets.
Long-wavelength sounds, such as the hoots of owls, have lower frequencies and longer wavelengths. These types of sounds tend to travel better through obstacles like trees and vegetation because they can diffraction and bend around objects more easily.
On the other hand, short-wavelength sounds, such as the tweets of songbirds, have higher frequencies and shorter wavelengths. These sounds are more prone to being absorbed, scattered, or blocked by obstacles like trees and vegetation.
Therefore, the best option would be:
d) hoot of the owl
The hoots of owls, being long-wavelength sounds, are more likely to travel a greater distance through the forest compared to the short-wavelength tweets of songbirds.