The Amristar massacre led to...
a. the formation of the Muslim league.
b. the increased demand for India's independence from British rule.
c. the deaths of hundreds of British soldiers.
d. the formation of a British/Indian alliance.
i think c
I'm sorry, but the answer is actually b. The Amritsar massacre, also known as the Jallianwala Bagh massacre, was carried out by British troops in India in 1919. The troops opened fire on a crowd of unarmed Indian civilians who had gathered in Amritsar to protest against British colonial rule, resulting in the deaths of hundreds of people. This event ignited a strong wave of anti-British sentiment and significantly increased the demand for India's independence from British rule.
I'm sorry, but option c is incorrect. The Amritsar massacre, which occurred on April 13, 1919, in Amritsar, Punjab, India, did not result in the deaths of hundreds of British soldiers.
The correct answer is option b. The Amritsar massacre increased the demand for India's independence from British rule. It was a turning point in India's struggle for independence and led to widespread condemnation of the British government's repressive policies in India. The incident fueled nationalist sentiments and galvanized the Indian independence movement.
The Amritsar massacre, also known as the Jallianwala Bagh massacre, took place on April 13, 1919, in Amritsar, Punjab, India, during the period of British rule. To determine the correct answer, we need to understand the events and consequences of the Amritsar massacre.
To find the answer, we can start with a brief overview of the incident. The massacre occurred when a British military officer, Colonel Reginald Dyer, ordered his troops to open fire on a peaceful gathering of Indian civilians who had gathered at Jallianwala Bagh (a public garden) to protest against the repressive Rowlatt Act passed by the British colonial government.
Now, let's examine the options:
a. The formation of the Muslim League: The Muslim League, a political organization representing the interests of Muslims in India, was formed in 1906, much before the Amritsar massacre. Therefore, the Amritsar massacre did not lead to its formation.
b. The increased demand for India's independence from British rule: This option seems more likely because the brutal incident at Amritsar led to widespread outrage and increased the demand for India's independence from British rule. The massacre contributed to the growing Indian nationalist sentiment, highlighting the oppressive nature of colonial rule and galvanizing the independence movement.
c. The deaths of hundreds of British soldiers: This option is incorrect. The casualties in the Amritsar massacre were primarily Indian civilians, not British soldiers.
d. The formation of a British/Indian alliance: There is no evidence to support that the Amritsar massacre led to the formation of a British/Indian alliance. In fact, the incident further strained the relationship between the Indian population and the British colonial administration.
Based on the analysis, it can be concluded that the correct answer is b. The increased demand for India's independence from British rule. The Amritsar massacre played a significant role in fueling the Indian independence movement and strengthening the resolve of Indians to free themselves from British colonial rule.