How were Kennedy and Johnson's approaches to foreign relations different?
A.
Kennedy decreased covert military operations, while Johnson increased them again.
B.
Kennedy focused on domestic programs, while Johnson worked on spreading democracy abroad.
C.
Kennedy believed foreign relations key to the presidency, while Johnson was inexperienced in that area.
D.
Kennedy continued Eisenhower's program of containment, while Johnson worked to end involvement in foreign wars.
It was C
D. Kennedy continued Eisenhower's program of containment, while Johnson worked to end involvement in foreign wars.
The correct answer is D. Kennedy continued Eisenhower's program of containment, while Johnson worked to end involvement in foreign wars.
Kennedy continued with the foreign policy approach of containment, which was initiated by President Eisenhower. This approach aimed to stop the spread of communism and limit Soviet influence around the world. Kennedy focused on this strategy during the Cuban Missile Crisis and the Bay of Pigs invasion.
On the other hand, Johnson had a different approach. He sought to end the United States' involvement in foreign wars, specifically the Vietnam War. Johnson escalated U.S. military involvement in Vietnam with the belief that it would prevent the spread of communism. However, his approach differed from Kennedy's in that he had a stronger commitment to achieving a peaceful resolution and ultimately withdrew American troops from Vietnam.
So, Kennedy and Johnson had different approaches to foreign relations, with Kennedy continuing the containment policy and Johnson working towards ending involvement in foreign wars.
To determine how Kennedy and Johnson's approaches to foreign relations were different, we can analyze the provided options.
A. Kennedy decreased covert military operations, while Johnson increased them again.
To verify this option, we could look at the historical record of covert military operations during both presidents' terms. Researching books, articles, or official documents that discuss Kennedy and Johnson's policies would help determine if there were any notable changes in covert military operations.
B. Kennedy focused on domestic programs, while Johnson worked on spreading democracy abroad.
To confirm this option, we could examine Kennedy's and Johnson's policy agendas and speeches. Analyzing primary sources such as Kennedy's inaugural address or Johnson's State of the Union speeches would provide insights into their priorities and goals regarding domestic programs and democracy promotion.
C. Kennedy believed foreign relations key to the presidency, while Johnson was inexperienced in that area.
To assess this option, we could explore biographies or speeches of Kennedy and Johnson, as well as their actions during their presidencies. By examining their foreign policy decisions and statements, we could evaluate if Kennedy placed greater emphasis on foreign relations compared to Johnson.
D. Kennedy continued Eisenhower's program of containment, while Johnson worked to end involvement in foreign wars.
To determine if this option is valid, we would need to study Kennedy's and Johnson's foreign policy decisions and actions. Evaluating their positions on containment and their approach to ending involvement in foreign wars, such as the Vietnam War, would help establish the differences between their administrations.
By conducting research and examining primary and secondary sources, we can accurately determine the differences in Kennedy and Johnson's foreign policy approaches. Remember to critically analyze the credibility and biases of the sources when conducting research.