How does the change in the election process for U.S. senators exemplify the flexibility and enduring nature of the Constitution?

Responses

The change reflects the fact that state legislators were far more informed than average citizens were in 1787 and shows how this ceased to be true with the rise of the media in the twentieth century.
The change reflects the fact that state legislators were far more informed than average citizens were in 1787 and shows how this ceased to be true with the rise of the media in the twentieth century.

The change reflects how the amendment process allows for alterations to the Constitution when the times and the people's interests demand change.
The change reflects how the amendment process allows for alterations to the Constitution when the times and the people's interests demand change.

The change reflects the judicial branch's shifting interpretation of the intentions of the Framers.
The change reflects the judicial branch's shifting interpretation of the intentions of the Framers.

The change occurred in response to pressure from many senators, who believed the political power would increase if they were elected directly by the people.

The change occurred in response to pressure from many senators, who believed the political power would increase if they were elected directly by the people, which exemplifies the flexibility of the Constitution to respond to changing political and social contexts. Additionally, the change has endured for over a century, highlighting the lasting nature of this amendment and the Constitution as a whole.