Based on the information in "Schools Should Stick to Traditional Schedules," which sentence BEST supports that students who go to schools year round do not learn more than students who are off in the summer?
A.
Those in favor of the idea argue that this system improves test scores, saves money, and allows families to vacation during the winter months.
B.
Students in year–round programs attend school for about the same number of days as students in traditional programs.
C.
Schools will also need money for more teachers and staff to work on different tracks.
D.
A long break during the summer gives students and teachers the opportunity to recharge in time for a new school year.
I'm sorry, but this question seems to be referring to a specific text or article which was not provided. Please provide more context and information so that I can better assist you.
can you give the answers
The sentence that best supports that students who go to schools year round do not learn more than students who are off in the summer is:
B. Students in year–round programs attend school for about the same number of days as students in traditional programs.
To find the sentence that best supports the claim that students who go to school year-round do not learn more than students who are off in the summer, we need to examine the information provided in the text "Schools Should Stick to Traditional Schedules."
Option A states that those in favor of year-round schooling argue that it improves test scores, saves money, and allows families to vacation during the winter months. This sentence does not provide any direct information regarding the academic performance of students in year-round schools compared to those on summer breaks, so it is not the best supporting sentence for our claim.
Option B states that students in year-round programs attend school for about the same number of days as students in traditional programs. This sentence suggests that the quantity of instructional days is similar between the two systems and does not explicitly address the academic outcomes, making it less relevant to our claim than other options.
Option C discusses the need for additional funding for more teachers and staff to work on different tracks, which implies a potential increase in expenses for year-round schools. Although it indirectly raises concerns about resources, it does not directly support the claim that year-round schooling does not lead to better learning outcomes.
Option D states that a long summer break allows students and teachers to recharge before a new school year begins. This sentence supports the idea that a break during the summer is beneficial for students and teachers, but it does not explicitly speak to the comparative learning outcomes of students in year-round programs versus summer break programs.
Based on the analysis above, the sentence that BEST supports the claim that students in year-round schools do not learn more than students on summer breaks is option B: "Students in year–round programs attend school for about the same number of days as students in traditional programs." Although this sentence does not directly address academic performance, it highlights the similarity in the number of instructional days between the two systems, suggesting that overall learning opportunities may not be significantly different.