Which best explains why the author of a narrative might describe events in a different order than they occurred?
• to create suspense by withholding information from the reader
• to confuse the reader by rearranging the sequence of events
• to create a mistake that the reader has to find and correct
• to prove that this is the best way to present events to the reader
The best answer is "to create suspense by withholding information from the reader." By telling events out of order, the author can build up tension and suspense, making the reader wonder what will happen next and how everything ties together. It's a clever way to engage readers and keep them interested in the story.
The best explanation why the author of a narrative might describe events in a different order than they occurred is to create suspense by withholding information from the reader.
The best explanation for why the author of a narrative might describe events in a different order than they occurred is to create suspense by withholding information from the reader. This technique, commonly known as "flashback" or "foreshadowing," is often used by authors to heighten the reader's curiosity and engage them in the story.
To determine the answer to this question, it is helpful to analyze the possible options and assess which one aligns with commonly observed techniques used by authors in storytelling.
Option A states that the author describes events in a different order to create suspense by withholding information from the reader. This approach is widely used in storytelling, as authors strategically reveal information to keep the reader engaged and curious about what will happen next. By deliberately altering the sequence of events, the author can generate anticipation and make the narrative more intriguing.
Option B suggests that the author rearranges the sequence of events to confuse the reader. However, confusing the reader is rarely the primary objective of an author, as it can lead to frustration and a loss of interest in the story. While some authors may incorporate elements of surprise or twist into the narrative, their goal is usually to create suspense or reveal unexpected information rather than merely confusing the reader.
Option C proposes that the author creates a mistake that the reader has to find and correct. Although some authors may include elements of ambiguity or allow room for interpretation, deliberately presenting a mistake for the reader to identify and correct is not a common practice in storytelling.
Option D argues that the author aims to prove that presenting events in a different order is the best way to do so. However, authors generally do not seek to prove a point about the order of events by intentionally altering the sequence. Their primary focus is to create an engaging and impactful narrative that resonates with the reader.
Therefore, the most accurate explanation is option A: to create suspense by withholding information from the reader.