What arguments were made for and against the League of Nations?
How did they compare with arguments for and against U.S. involvement in World War I?
Arguments for the League of Nations included the idea that it would help to maintain peace and security in the world, promote international cooperation, and provide a forum for resolving disputes. It was also seen as a way to prevent future wars by providing a collective security system.
Arguments against the League of Nations included the idea that it would be too costly and ineffective, that it would infringe on national sovereignty, and that it would be dominated by the major powers.
The arguments for and against U.S. involvement in World War I were largely based on the same principles. Supporters argued that the U.S. should join the war to protect democracy and freedom, while opponents argued that the war was too costly and would lead to further conflict.