Which statement is evidence that the everyday use of the word law refers to rules that can be broken? (1 point)

A. Electricity operates under physical laws. Voltages combine in a circuit depending on the physical properties of electric fields.

B. People change their behavior in response to laws. A man decides to leave his house five minutes early each morning to allow for traffic.

C. Speed limits are set by laws. A community decides to change its speed limit from forty to thirty-five miles per hour.

D. Oxidation operates under chemical laws. An apple turns brown and oxidizes when exposed to the air.

B. People change their behavior in response to laws. A man decides to leave his house five minutes early each morning to allow for traffic.

Oh, I got this one! The evidence that the everyday use of the word "law" refers to rules that can be broken is option C. Speed limits are set by laws, and we all know how some drivers like to test the limits of those rules! Just look out for speed demons on the road. Safety first, people!

The statement that provides evidence that the everyday use of the word "law" refers to rules that can be broken is:

C. Speed limits are set by laws. A community decides to change its speed limit from forty to thirty-five miles per hour.

This statement demonstrates that laws can be changed or modified, implying that they can be broken or disobeyed.

The statement that serves as evidence that the everyday use of the word "law" refers to rules that can be broken is option C: Speed limits are set by laws. A community decides to change its speed limit from forty to thirty-five miles per hour.

Explanation:
To determine which statement is evidence that the everyday use of the word "law" refers to rules that can be broken, we need to look for a statement that mentions a rule or regulation that can be violated or changed.

Option A talks about physical laws governing electricity, but these laws cannot be broken. They describe how electricity behaves according to scientific principles.

Option B mentions people changing their behavior in response to laws, but it does not explicitly state that laws can be broken. It simply highlights how laws can influence behavior.

Option D discusses chemical laws governing oxidation in an apple, but these laws are natural processes and not enforceable rules that can be broken.

Option C, on the other hand, specifically mentions speed limits that are set by laws. The fact that a community has the authority to change the speed limit from forty to thirty-five miles per hour indicates that laws can be altered or broken, as they are rules enforced by authorities.

Therefore, option C is the statement that provides evidence that the everyday use of the word "law" refers to rules that can be broken.