Suppose a plant is eaten by a mouse, the mouse is consumed by a snake, and the snake is in turn consumed by a hawk. What could be assumed about the level of available organic matter in the mouse versus the plant?
There will be less organic matter available.
They both have the same amount of organic matter.
Organic matter does not transfer between the plant and the mouse.
There will be more organic matter available.
they will have less organic matter avalible say your snake eats a mouse then the snake doesnt steal all of it uses alot of it (the mouse) and then the snake eats whats left until theres none. hope i helped- Mrs. God <3
the mouse uses most of the energy to live and whats left it used by the snake. - Mrs. God <3
There will be less organic matter available.
To determine what could be assumed about the level of available organic matter in the mouse versus the plant, we need to consider the concept of energy transfer in an ecosystem.
In an ecosystem, energy flows from one organism to another through a series of feeding relationships. In this scenario, the plant is being eaten by the mouse, then the mouse is consumed by the snake, and finally, the snake is consumed by the hawk.
At each trophic level (feeding level) in an ecosystem, there is a decrease in the amount of energy that is available. This decrease is known as the 10% rule, which means that only about 10% of the energy from one trophic level is available to the next trophic level. The remaining energy is lost as heat or used for metabolism.
Given that the hawk is at a higher trophic level than the snake, the snake is at a higher trophic level than the mouse, and the mouse is at a higher trophic level than the plant, we can assume that there will be less organic matter available in the mouse compared to the plant.
Therefore, the correct answer is: There will be less organic matter available.