Excerpt from Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857)

4. A free negro of the African race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a "citizen" within the meaning of the Constitution of the United States.

5. When the Constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the States as members of the community which constituted the State, and were not numbered among its "people or citizen." Consequently, the special rights and immunities guaranteed to citizens do not apply to them. And not being "citizens" within the meaning of the Constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the United States, and the Circuit Court has not jurisdiction in such a suit.

Use the excerpt to answer the question.

Why might this decision have angered people in the North and appeased people in the South?

A.
It permitted the spread of slavery.

B.
It upheld state laws over federal laws.

C.
It weakened the power of the national government.

D.
It protected the rights of slaveowners across the nation.

PLEASE, ALSO EXPLAIN WHY ITS THE CORRECT ANSWER, DO NOT GUESS, USE THE EXPERT.

D. It protected the rights of slaveowners across the nation. The decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford declared that free African Americans were not citizens and therefore not entitled to the rights and privileges of citizens, including the right to sue in federal court. This decision protected the rights of slaveowners across the nation, which would have appeased people in the South. However, this decision angered people in the North, who were opposed to slavery.