After the death of (Blank), the Roman empire slowly started to decline. Potential new emperors began to focus on pleasing the (Blank) at the expense of the (Blank). The resulting (Blank) was just one reason for the fall of the empire.
WRONG
I pray you got the answer right
To fill in the blanks, we need to understand the context of the decline of the Roman Empire.
The first blank most likely refers to a specific person whose death marked the beginning of the decline. One possible answer could be Emperor Marcus Aurelius. He was the last of the "Five Good Emperors" who governed Rome during the Pax Romana, a relatively stable and prosperous period. His death in 180 CE initiated a series of political instability and a decline in capable leadership.
The second blank refers to a group that potential new emperors started focusing on pleasing. This group had significant influence and power in the Roman Empire, and their favor was sought after by those aspiring to become emperor. This group is most likely referring to the Roman military or the Roman army. As the empire grew larger, the military became increasingly powerful, often acting as kingmakers and exerting significant influence over politics.
Lastly, the third blank refers to a consequence or result of the emperors appeasing the military. One possible answer could be the neglect of other important aspects of the empire, such as the economy, governance, infrastructure, and the overall well-being of the citizens. This neglect led to a decline in these areas, causing the empire to weaken internally.
Therefore, the resulting consequence of focusing on pleasing the military at the expense of other crucial aspects of the empire was a general decline in overall stability and prosperity. This decline was just one of the reasons for the fall of the Roman Empire, which was a complex process influenced by multiple factors, including invasions, internal conflicts, economic issues, and decline in moral values.