Select the boxes in the table to show whether the following might be considered a valid source for online research.
Yes
No
the National Archives
a weblog of a guy who describes himself as a “history nerd”
a Wikipedia article
a weblog of a college history professor about her area of specialty
a . org website that was last updated in 2008
a . com website with its own online store
a . gov website
a website with claims that you can’t verify at another source
Yes No
the National Archives _________
a weblog of a guy who describes himself as a “history nerd” _________
a Wikipedia article _________
a weblog of a college history professor about her area of specialty _________
a . org website that was last updated in 2008 _________
a . com website with its own online store _________
a . gov website _________
a website with claims that you can’t verify at another source _________
Yes No
the National Archives Yes
a weblog of a guy who describes himself as a “history nerd” No
a Wikipedia article Yes
a weblog of a college history professor about her area of specialty Yes
a . org website that was last updated in 2008 No
a . com website with its own online store No
a . gov website Yes
a website with claims that you can’t verify at another source No
Yes: the National Archives, a weblog of a college history professor about her area of specialty, a . gov website
No: a weblog of a guy who describes himself as a "history nerd", a Wikipedia article, a .org website that was last updated in 2008, a .com website with its own online store, a website with claims that you can't verify at another source
To determine whether a source might be considered valid for online research, you can consider factors such as credibility, accuracy, currency, and authority. Let's evaluate each of the sources listed in the table to determine whether they are potentially valid sources for online research:
1. the National Archives - Yes
The National Archives is generally considered a reliable and credible source for historical research.
2. a weblog of a guy who describes himself as a “history nerd” - No
A weblog maintained by an individual without any recognized expertise or credentials may not be considered a reliable or credible source for academic research.
3. a Wikipedia article - Maybe
Wikipedia can be a good starting point for research, but it is generally not considered a scholarly source. While it may provide background information, it is essential to verify the information from other reputable sources.
4. a weblog of a college history professor about her area of specialty - Yes
A weblog maintained by a college history professor can be a good source for research. They possess expertise and knowledge in their field of study.
5. a .org website that was last updated in 2008 - Maybe
While a .org website may indicate that it is affiliated with an organization, the fact that it was last updated in 2008 raises concerns about the currency and reliability of the information. It needs to be verified with more recent and updated sources.
6. a .com website with its own online store - No
A .com website with an online store may be biased and focused on selling products rather than providing unbiased information. It may not be considered a reliable source for academic research.
7. a .gov website - Yes
A .gov website is generally considered a reliable and credible source. It represents a government entity and often provides accurate and authoritative information.
8. a website with claims that you can’t verify at another source - No
If a website makes claims that cannot be verified or supported by other reputable sources, it may not be considered a reliable or valid source for online research.
By considering these factors and evaluating the credibility, accuracy, currency, and authority of each source, you can determine whether they might be considered valid sources for online research.