In Poe's cask of amontillado, which of the following makes montresor an unreliable narrater

#1=b #2=c #3=a

^ for conexus users

In Edgar Allan Poe's "The Cask of Amontillado," Montresor exhibits several qualities that make him an unreliable narrator. The unreliable narrator is a narrative device where the credibility or reliability of the narrator is called into question. Here are three reasons that contribute to Montresor's unreliability:

1. Bias: Montresor is driven by a deep-seated desire for revenge against Fortunato. This personal bias influences his narrative, as his hatred and desire for retribution may skew his account of events. His actions are motivated by his own twisted sense of justice, making him an unreliable narrator.

2. Deception: Throughout the story, Montresor deceives the reader and Fortunato. He befriends Fortunato, acting warmly towards him, and earns his trust before leading him to his downfall. This deception casts doubt on Montresor's honesty and subsequently questions the authenticity of his account.

3. Disturbed Mind: Montresor's actions and thoughts reveal a disturbed and obsessive mind. His meticulous planning, lack of empathy, and enjoyment of Fortunato's suffering suggest a disturbed mental state. This mental instability can cloud his judgment and further raise doubts about the accuracy of his narration.

In summary, Montresor's biased nature, capacity for deception, and disturbed mind make him an unreliable narrator in "The Cask of Amontillado."

To determine which aspect makes Montresor an unreliable narrator in Edgar Allan Poe's "The Cask of Amontillado," it is essential to analyze his narration and actions throughout the story. An unreliable narrator is a character who may misinterpret events, manipulate the truth, or have a biased perspective, causing the reader to question the reliability of their account.

In "The Cask of Amontillado," Montresor's unreliability becomes apparent in several ways. First, he presents an unreliable viewpoint by showcasing his deep-seated desire for revenge against Fortunato, the story's victim. Montresor's motivation skews his perception, casting doubt on his interpretation of events.

Secondly, Montresor creates a sense of dramatic irony throughout the story. He skillfully manipulates the reader's understanding of events by employing elements of foreshadowing and symbolism. For instance, Montresor repeatedly refers to the Masonic order's secret sign, knowing that Fortunato is unaware of its meaning. This manipulation contributes to the sense of unreliability, as Montresor's intention is to deceive both Fortunato and the reader.

Lastly, Montresor's actions and thoughts throughout the story are morally questionable. He plans and executes a cruel and murderous act without any genuine provocation. Montresor's lack of remorse and his enjoyment of the suffering he inflicts on Fortunato highlight his skewed moral compass, further casting doubt on his reliability as a narrator.

In summary, Montresor's unreliable narration in "The Cask of Amontillado" is evident through his biased perspective, use of dramatic irony, and morally reprehensible actions. Understanding these aspects allows the reader to discern the unreliability of his account and the twisted nature of his character.