CHOOSE ALL THAT APPLY: How does a writer of a persuasive text address conflicting viewpoint and evidence?
*
1 point
A writer of a persuasive text gives his or her own argument with evidence.
The writer introduces opposing viewpoints and evidence. (counterclaim)
The writer agrees with the opposing viewpoints and evidence.
The writer refutes the opposing evidence.
To address conflicting viewpoints and evidence in a persuasive text, a writer can choose multiple strategies. Here are the options to choose from:
1. A writer of a persuasive text gives his or her own argument with evidence. This means that the writer presents their viewpoint and provides supporting evidence to strengthen their argument.
2. The writer introduces opposing viewpoints and evidence. This strategy involves acknowledging and presenting the counterarguments or opposing perspectives. By doing so, the writer demonstrates an understanding of different perspectives on the topic.
3. The writer agrees with the opposing viewpoints and evidence. This approach involves accepting and acknowledging the opposing viewpoints and evidence as valid. However, it is worth noting that this might not be the most effective approach for persuading readers.
4. The writer refutes the opposing evidence. This strategy involves directly addressing and debunking the evidence presented by the opposing viewpoints. By providing counterarguments, showing flaws, or presenting alternative evidence, the writer aims to weaken the opposing position.
When choosing all that apply, options 2 and 4 seem to be the best answers as they both address how a writer can handle conflicting viewpoints and evidence. Option 1 also applies, but it solely focuses on the writer's argument without explicitly including conflicting viewpoints. Option 3, on the other hand, is not an advisable strategy for persuasive writing as it does not effectively address the opposing viewpoints.