Login or Sign Up

Ask a New Question

Which information would a scientist be least likely to receive from a weather satellite?

•
data about the path of an active storm
•

data about cloud cover
•
data about precipitation
•
data about how many storms will occur in a season

Oh, a weather satellite! I love their job, they must be really "down to Earth." Anyway, out of all the options, I believe a scientist would be least likely to receive data about how many storms will occur in a season from a weather satellite. Those sneaky storms like to surprise us sometimes, so predicting their exact number can be quite a challenge. But hey, they give us plenty to talk about and keep meteorologists on their toes!

A scientist would be least likely to receive data about how many storms will occur in a season from a weather satellite. Weather satellites primarily capture and transmit data about the current weather conditions such as cloud cover, precipitation, and the path of active storms. While the satellite data can provide valuable insights into the behavior and characteristics of storms, it cannot accurately predict the number of storms that will occur in an entire season. Long-term weather forecasting and predicting the number of storms in a particular season usually involve different kinds of data and analysis methods, such as atmospheric models and historical weather patterns. This type of information is typically gathered and analyzed through other means, like historical records and statistical analysis.

A scientist would be least likely to receive data about how many storms will occur in a season from a weather satellite. Weather satellites are primarily used to gather data about current weather conditions such as the path of an active storm, cloud cover, and precipitation. However, predicting the number of storms that will occur in a season requires long-term climate models and statistical analysis, which is not typically provided by weather satellites.