Mr. Hunt lived in Ohio in 1843. He was concerned about the amount of federal debt. What would have been Mr. Hunt’s view of Texas joining the United States?
• He would have supported it due to it likely growing the U.S. economy.
• He would have opposed it due to Texas' amount of debt.
• He would have supported it due to its geographic location.
• He would have opposed it due to its geographic location.
To determine Mr. Hunt's view on Texas joining the United States in 1843, we need to consider the factors that were likely important to him at the time. Since he lived in Ohio and was concerned about the federal debt, we can assume that he prioritized economic considerations.
In terms of economic impact, Texas joining the United States could potentially contribute to the growth of the U.S. economy. Texas was a large territory with abundant natural resources, particularly in agriculture and oil. By becoming part of the United States, Texas would have opened up new markets and resources, leading to potential economic benefits. Therefore, Mr. Hunt would have likely supported Texas joining the United States due to its potential favorable impact on the U.S. economy.
However, the amount of debt in Texas was not specifically mentioned as one of Mr. Hunt's concerns. Thus, it would not be a deciding factor in his view on Texas joining the United States.
Geographic location also does not appear to be a prominent concern for Mr. Hunt based on the information provided. Therefore, we can rule out both the support and opposition based solely on geographic location.
In conclusion, Mr. Hunt would have supported Texas joining the United States primarily due to its potential to contribute to the growth of the U.S. economy.