Questions LLC
Login
or
Sign Up
Ask a New Question
Geography
Earthquakes
Is a 2.0 earthquake bad?
1 answer
No, a 2.0 earthquake is generally considered to be a minor earthquake and is not usually considered to be bad. However, it can still cause minor damage to buildings and other structures, so it is important to take precautions.
You can
ask a new question
or
answer this question
.
Related Questions
Not every earthquake has a(n) (foreshock), but every earthquake has (aftershocks) that occur (in the same place) as the
This exercise deals with logarithmic scales.
Earthquake A had a magnitude of 8.2 on the Richter scale. At the same time an
If it has been determined that the probability of an earthquake occurring on a certain day in a
certain area is 0.05, what are
An earthquake occurs at a convergent boundary. The earthquake has a high magnitude, and an observer reports the earthquake
What does a seismograph record?(1 point)
Responses the vibrations produced by an earthquake the vibrations produced by an
the odds in favor of an earthquake are 7 to 1. what is probability that an earthquake will occur?
So is it 1/7 ? im confused
On September 26 2001, an earthquake in North Bay measured 5.0 on the Ritcher scale. What is the magnitude of an earthquake 3
An earthquake occurs at a convergent boundary. The earthquake has a high magnitude, and an observer reports the earthquake
What does a seismograph record?(1 point) Responses the distance from the epicenter of an earthquake the distance from the
An earthquake occurs at a convergent boundary. The earthquake has a high magnitude, and an observer reports the earthquake
