At a hall meeting, a politician is supportive of a change in the town's energy supply away from fossil fuels. What is the strongest reason the politician could present? (1 point)
obtaining energy quickly rather than having to process and refine materials
reducing the cost of obtaining and transporting energy
using energy that is not harmful to people or the environment
finding an energy source that is nonrenewable
The strongest reason the politician could present for the change in the town's energy supply away from fossil fuels is using energy that is not harmful to people or the environment. To arrive at this answer, let's analyze the given options:
1. Obtaining energy quickly rather than having to process and refine materials: This option focuses on efficiency but does not address the environmental or health concerns associated with fossil fuels. Therefore, it is not the strongest reason.
2. Reducing the cost of obtaining and transporting energy: While reducing costs is a valid concern, it is not as compelling as the potential harm that fossil fuels pose to both people and the environment.
3. Using energy that is not harmful to people or the environment: This option directly addresses the negative impacts of fossil fuels and is the strongest reason for transitioning to alternative energy sources.
4. Finding an energy source that is nonrenewable: This option implies the use of unsustainable energy sources, which is contrary to the politician's goal of moving away from fossil fuels. Thus, it is not a strong reason.
By analyzing the options and considering the aim of transitioning away from fossil fuels, it is clear that the strongest reason the politician could present is using energy that is not harmful to people or the environment.