Which of the following describes a key difference between arbitration and mediation?(1 point)
Responses
In arbitration, an outsider is brought in to help resolve a conflict.
In arbitration, an outsider is brought in to help resolve a conflict.
The arbitrator has the power to render a binding decision.
The arbitrator has the power to render a binding decision.
The mediator has the power to render a binding decision.
The mediator has the power to render a binding decision.
In mediation, an outsider is brought in to help resolve a conflict.
The key difference between arbitration and mediation is that in arbitration, the arbitrator has the power to render a binding decision, while in mediation, the mediator does not have the power to render a binding decision.
To arrive at this answer, you can analyze the options provided:
Option 1: "In arbitration, an outsider is brought in to help resolve a conflict." This describes a common characteristic of both arbitration and mediation, so it does not provide a key difference.
Option 2: "The arbitrator has the power to render a binding decision." This accurately describes arbitration, where the arbitrator is empowered to make a final decision that is legally binding on both parties involved.
Option 3: "The mediator has the power to render a binding decision." This is incorrect because mediators do not have the authority to impose a binding decision. Mediation is a voluntary process where the mediator facilitates communication and negotiation between parties, but the final agreement is reached by the parties themselves.
Option 4: "In mediation, an outsider is brought in to help resolve a conflict." This is another common characteristic of both arbitration and mediation, so it does not provide a key difference.
Based on the above analysis, the correct answer is option 2: "The arbitrator has the power to render a binding decision."