Which of the following might a limited government be more likely to do than an unlimited government?
A.
build and maintain public roads
B.
protect citizens from attack
C.
operate public schools
D.
let citizens speak freely and protest
A limited government is characterized by having certain restrictions and limitations on its powers and authority, whereas an unlimited government has few or no restrictions on its powers. Based on this understanding, let's analyze the given options:
A. Build and maintain public roads: Both limited and unlimited governments have the authority to build and maintain public infrastructure like roads. Therefore, this is not something that a limited government would be more likely to do than an unlimited government.
B. Protect citizens from attack: The primary role of any government, whether limited or unlimited, is to ensure the safety and security of its citizens. Therefore, protecting citizens from attack is a responsibility that both types of government are likely to fulfill.
C. Operate public schools: The operation of public schools usually falls under the purview of a government, regardless of its limitations. Therefore, this is not something specifically associated with a limited government.
D. Let citizens speak freely and protest: This option refers to the freedom of speech and the right to protest, which are generally associated with limited governments that prioritize individual rights and freedoms. In contrast, an unlimited government may be more inclined to suppress dissent and control communication.
Considering these factors, the answer is D. Let citizens speak freely and protest, as a limited government is more likely to allow and uphold the rights of its citizens to express their opinions and engage in peaceful protests.