Which of the following might a limited government be more likely to do than an unlimited government?
None of them?
A limited government is more likely to:
1. Respect and protect individual rights: Limited governments often have constitutional or legal provisions that safeguard and uphold the rights of individuals, such as freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and the right to a fair trial.
2. Maintain a system of checks and balances: Limited governments typically have mechanisms in place to prevent any one branch or individual from gaining too much power. This can include separate branches of government with specified powers and the ability to veto or override decisions.
3. Stay within the boundaries of its specified powers: Limited governments operate within a defined framework of authority and jurisdiction. They are more likely to follow a written constitution or codified laws that outline their limitations, avoiding overreach into areas outside of their designated scope.
4. Promote a free market economy: Limited governments often embrace a laissez-faire or free market approach to economics, where the role of the government in economic activity is minimal. This means allowing private individuals and businesses to engage in voluntary transactions with minimal interference or regulation from the government.
5. Respect state and local autonomy: Limited governments tend to recognize and respect the authority and autonomy of state and local governments. They provide a level of independence for subnational entities to make decisions within their own jurisdictional boundaries.
It's important to note that these are general tendencies associated with limited governments, and actual government systems can vary in their specific practices and policies.