Career counselor: It is best for artists to build a practical and safe career that will guarantee them a secure income, and then pursue their art in their spare time. That way, they will be motivated to work hard at their day jobs to support their art making, and both their career and their art will thrive.
Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument?
To weaken the argument, we need to find a statement that challenges the notion that artists should prioritize a practical and safe career to support their art. Here are a few options to consider:
1. "Studies show that artists who focus solely on their art and dedicate more time and energy to it tend to see greater growth and success in their careers." This statement suggests that prioritizing art over a practical career can actually benefit artists in terms of career development.
2. "Many successful artists have achieved financial stability through their art alone, without the need for a separate safe career." This statement implies that it is possible for artists to solely rely on their artistic endeavors for financial security.
3. "Artists who have pursued a practical career in addition to their art report feeling burnt out and lacking the necessary time and energy to fully dedicate themselves to their artistic pursuits." This statement highlights the negative consequences of juggling a day job and artistic aspirations, suggesting that it may not be the best approach for all artists.
In sum, any statement that emphasizes the alternative paths to a successful art career or highlights the potential drawbacks of pursuing a practical career alongside art would weaken the argument.