1.which of the following describes a key difference between arbitration and meditation?
the arbitrator has the power to render a binding decision.
2.prior to labor unions, both the employer and employee had the legal right to terminate an employment agreement for any reason. this is known as
employment at will.
3.which of the following is an example of an industrial union?
a union composed of movie-making professionals
4.what is personal liberty?
personal liberty refers to an individual’s ability to enact his or her will on the world around him or her.
5.is the following statement correct? if it is not correct, fix the sentence so that it is correct.
a laissez-faire economic system is one in which government intervention is minimal and productive decisions are arrived at through the self-interested behavior of competing firms.
the statement is correct.
5/13/2022
sorry if answers change D:
1. The key difference between arbitration and meditation is that in arbitration, the arbitrator has the power to render a binding decision, while in meditation, the mediator facilitates a discussion and helps the parties reach their own agreement, but does not make a decision.
2. Prior to labor unions, both the employer and employee had the legal right to terminate an employment agreement for any reason. This is known as "employment at will," also known as "the free-for-all fire 'em carnival."
3. An example of an industrial union is a union composed of movie-making professionals who unite to fight against clown discrimination in movies.
4. Personal liberty is like having the freedom to eat pizza with pineapple toppings even though society considers it a crime against nature.
5. Yes, the statement is correct. In a laissez-faire economic system, the government's intervention is minimal, allowing competing firms to duke it out with their self-interested behavior, like a wild west showdown where the most ruthless capitalists win. Yeehaw!
1. The key difference between arbitration and mediation is that the arbitrator has the power to render a binding decision, while a mediator does not have such power and instead facilitates a negotiation process to help parties reach a mutually agreeable solution.
2. Prior to labor unions, both the employer and employee had the legal right to terminate an employment agreement for any reason. This is known as employment at will, where either party can end the employment relationship without prior notice or justification.
3. An example of an industrial union is a union composed of movie-making professionals. Industrial unions typically represent workers in a specific industry or trade, regardless of their specific job role or occupation within that industry.
4. Personal liberty refers to an individual's ability to enact his or her will on the world around him or her. It encompasses the freedom to make choices, express oneself, and engage in activities without undue interference or constraint from others or the government.
5. The statement is correct. A laissez-faire economic system is indeed one in which government intervention is minimal, and productive decisions are primarily determined by the self-interested behavior of competing firms.
1. The key difference between arbitration and mediation is that in arbitration, the arbitrator has the power to render a binding decision. This means that the decision made by the arbitrator is legally enforceable and both parties are obligated to follow it. In contrast, in meditation, the mediator does not have the power to make a binding decision. Instead, the mediator facilitates the conversation between the parties and helps them reach a mutually acceptable resolution.
To arrive at this answer, I analyzed the options given in the question and compared their descriptions. The description that indicates the power of the arbitrator to render a binding decision stands out as the key difference between arbitration and meditation.
2. Prior to labor unions, the employer and employee both had the legal right to terminate an employment agreement for any reason. This is known as "employment at will."
To answer this question, I relied on the knowledge that prior to the emergence of labor unions, employment was generally regulated by the principle of employment at will. It means that employers and employees had the freedom to terminate the employment agreement without any specific reason, as long as it was not discriminatory or in violation of any other laws.
3. An example of an industrial union is a union composed of movie-making professionals.
To arrive at this answer, I analyzed the options provided and compared them to the definition of an industrial union. An industrial union is a type of labor union that represents workers in a specific industry, regardless of their job or occupation. Given that movie-making professionals can include a wide range of job roles such as actors, directors, cinematographers, and other production staff, it aligns with the definition of an industrial union.
4. Personal liberty refers to an individual's ability to enact his or her will on the world around him or her.
To answer this question, I relied on the definition of personal liberty. Personal liberty encompasses the concept of individual freedom, allowing individuals to exercise their rights and make choices without undue interference. It implies the absence of oppressive restrictions and the ability to act in accordance with one's own desires and values.
5. The statement provided is correct. A laissez-faire economic system is indeed one in which government intervention is minimal, and productive decisions are arrived at through the self-interested behavior of competing firms.
To determine the accuracy of the statement, I examined the definition of a laissez-faire economic system. Laissez-faire is a French term that translates to "let it be" in English, emphasizing the idea of limited government intervention in the economy. In a laissez-faire system, the government's role is typically limited to protecting property rights, enforcing contracts, and maintaining a competitive marketplace, while individual firms make decisions based on self-interest. The given statement accurately describes this concept, indicating that the system operates with minimal government intervention and decisions are driven by the self-interested behavior of competing firms.