Use the map of Georgia to consider different applications of von Thünen’s model.
Assuming an absence of topographical features, in one to two sentences describe how different types of farming would be arranged around Atlanta, according to von Thünen’s model.
In 2–3 sentences, describe how the site factors near Savannah would affect the distribution of types of farming around Savannah’s city center, according to von Thünen’s model.
In 1–2 sentences, explain how a national rail line through Atlanta, Macon, and Statesboro to Savannah might affect the distribution of farming and how this relates to von Thünen’s model.
In one sentence, give an example of a situation in which von Thünen’s model would have limited utility in explaining the distribution of agriculture.
PLS HELP!!!
did you ever find the answer?
.In 2–3 sentences describe how the site factors near Savannah would affect the distribution of types of farming around Savannah’s city center, according to von Thünen’s model.
an absence of topographical features, in one to two sentences describe how different types of farming would be arranged around Atlanta, according to von Thünen’s model.
According to von Thünen's model, different types of farming would be arranged in concentric rings around Atlanta with more intensive farming closer to the city center and less intensively used land further away.
The site factors near Savannah, such as proximity to the port and access to transportation, would likely result in a higher concentration of commercial and market-oriented farming closer to the city center, while more extensive and less perishable farming would be found further away.
If there was a national rail line connecting Atlanta, Macon, and Statesboro to Savannah, it would likely lead to an increased concentration of market-oriented farming near these cities, as they would have better access to transportation for selling their produce. This would align with von Thünen's model as it suggests that proximity to transportation routes influences the distribution of agricultural activities.
An example of a situation where von Thünen's model would have limited utility in explaining agriculture distribution is in regions with significant topographical features, such as mountainous areas, where the natural constraints on land and access to markets may override the model's predictions.
To consider different applications of von Thünen's model using the map of Georgia, it is important to understand the principles of the model. Von Thünen's model suggests that different types of farming are arranged in concentric circles around a city based on the cost of transportation.
1. Around Atlanta, assuming an absence of topographical features, according to von Thünen's model, we would expect to find more intensive and perishable agricultural activities closer to the city center, such as market gardening and dairy farming, followed by less intensive livestock and grain farming further away.
2. Near Savannah, the site factors such as proximity to ports, favorable climate, and access to water would lead to a concentration of activities that benefit from these features, such as commercial fishing and orchards, closer to the city center, while less specialized agriculture, such as grain farming, would be found further away.
3. If a national rail line were to pass through Atlanta, Macon, and Statesboro to Savannah, it would significantly affect the distribution of farming. The rail line would provide fast and efficient transportation, reducing transportation costs and potentially allowing for a wider variety of agricultural products to be grown and transported from the hinterland to the city center, potentially affecting the initial concentric circles of von Thünen's model.
4. Von Thünen's model would have limited utility in explaining the distribution of agriculture in situations where other factors, such as political boundaries, cultural practices, or economic factors, play a dominant role in shaping agricultural patterns. For example, in areas with highly regulated or subsidized agriculture, market forces and transportation costs may not be the primary drivers of agricultural location.