Can someone please help me with this question? I'm having trouble with it.
Describe how Herodotus and Thucydides each wrote history. In your own opinion, which method do most modern-day writers and reporters follow: Herodotus or Thucydides? Describe a general example of how misrepresentation facts can be dangerous. Your answer should be at least 5-7 sentences in length.
@copy and paste fr thooo finally someone who has common sense! 😩✋
@Nope and for you, nobody asked you in the first place! Take your mean self and go! Ty your making the world worse.
Dude, give the dude some slack! He doesn't know the answer and needs help! If you have a problem with that then just leave!
Sorry for the last part btw, that was a mean, but don’t reply if your not helping. You wasted all your time to write that?
Exactly @Sunset Lover!!! Thank you!!
To understand how Herodotus and Thucydides each wrote history, you can start by researching their respective works. Herodotus, known as the "Father of History," wrote primarily in a narrative style, seeking to entertain as well as inform his readers. He included a variety of sources, including oral accounts and myths, and often incorporated his own interpretations and personal beliefs. On the other hand, Thucydides, an Athenian historian, aimed for a more analytical and objective approach. He relied heavily on eyewitness accounts and firsthand information, striving to provide an unbiased and factual account of events.
In terms of modern-day writers and reporters, most tend to follow the method of Thucydides. Journalism strives for objectivity and fact-based reporting, relying on multiple sources and verification of information. Cr