Lelah has budgeted $135 for new clothes. She decides to buy a pair of shoes that cost $35.25, and then she buys some $18.25 shirts.Which inequality represents this situation, where ss is the number of shirts she can buy?
You should see something like
18.25ss + 35.25 ≤ 135
Lelah's shoe purchase leaves her with a budget of $135 - $35.25 = $99.75.
Let's assume she buys ss shirts, with each shirt costing $18.25.
The total cost of the shirts would be ss * $18.25.
So, the inequality representing this situation would be:
ss * $18.25 ≤ $99.75
To represent the situation where Lelah has a budget of $135 and wants to buy a pair of shoes that cost $35.25, as well as some shirts that cost $18.25 each, the following inequality can be used:
$135 - $35.25 - $18.25(ss) ≥ 0
This inequality ensures that the value on the left side, which represents the remaining budget after purchasing the shoes and shirts, is greater than or equal to zero, indicating that Lelah has enough money to make the purchases without exceeding her budget.
To represent the situation, we need an inequality that relates the total cost of the shoes, shirts, and Lelah's budget.
First, let's find the total cost of the shirts. We are given that each shirt costs $18.25, and we don't know the number of shirts Lelah can buy, so let's represent the number of shirts with variable "ss". Therefore, the cost of the shirts is 18.25 * ss.
The cost of the shoes is given as $35.25.
To represent the budget, we use the amount Lelah has budgeted, which is $135.
Now, we can write the inequality:
35.25 + 18.25 * ss ≤ 135
This inequality states that the cost of the shoes plus the cost of the shirts (18.25 * ss) must be less than or equal to $135.