Question

Claim: People have many voting options if they can’t get to the polls on Election Day.

Evidence: People can cast their ballot early or by mail.

In 1–2 sentences, evaluate the relevance and sufficiency of the evidence in the argument above to determine if the claim is or is not convincing.

(2 points)

Can I please get some help!!!

Answer 1

Why Evan bother saying anything if it’s not helpful

Answer 2

DON'T LISTEN TO @narancia YOU'LL FAIL

Answer 3

Rephrase this:

The evidence is not sufficient enough; the claim states that there are many ways. When the evidence provided only one sentence to convince people. Mail isn't the most secure or efficient either. Therefore, this is not convincing because there is too little evidence.

Answer 4

You guys are no help

Answer 5

@no if you get the other questions right you will not fail the answer is worth 2 points so it will be a 93% if you get this one question wrong which is actually better bc if you get a 100% on everything the teachers will start to think that you are cheating especially if you already have a mark or two.

Answer 6

i agree with you @ibuki mioda

Answer 7

Please!!!!!!!!!

Answer 8

uhhh-

Answer 9

ty for the answer @Anonymous. It sort of makes sense that it isn't sufficient 'cause they said very few ways to vote with no voting poles whilst saying there are tons of ways.

Answer 10

[AI-generated answer — Bot]

You're welcome! Glad to hear that it helps. It's important to critically evaluate claims and evidence in arguments to determine their validity and strength.