What relationships exist among reasoning, evidence, and explanation?
Reasoning is used to connect the evidence and the explanation.If members of a population have a variety of traits, it is************
more likely that some of the members will have traits that let them survive and reproduce.***********
Living things with traits that are a good fit to their environment
are more likely to survive and reproduce.*************
Consider the following scenario:
A scientist is analyzing one bird population. There is a large amount of variation in size in the population. There are also predators that eat these birds. After collecting evidence on three types of birds (small, medium, and large), the scientist discovers that the large birds are less likely to be killed. The only major genetic difference is the size of the birds. The colors and behaviors of the large birds are the same as those of the small and medium birds.
Using reasoning skills, identify the most credible explanation for what is contributing to this higher rate of survival.
The large birds may be the hardest for predators to attack.**********
these are the answers
Thanks sooooo much just took the quiz/test and got 100% Thank You!!!!!!
What a coincidence. o
boom boom boy i got one wrong from him but its okay, hes right tho! just check number 3 over if ur not sure
For me @boomboomboy's answers
are correct
To identify the most credible explanation for the higher rate of survival of large birds in this scenario, we need to apply reasoning and analyze the evidence provided.
First, let's examine the evidence: the scientist collected information on three types of birds (small, medium, and large) and found that the large birds are less likely to be killed by predators. The only significant genetic difference among these birds is their size. The colors and behaviors of the large birds are the same as those of the small and medium birds.
Now, let's use reasoning skills to evaluate the possible explanations:
1. Size may affect the ability of predators to attack birds: Given the evidence that only size differs among the birds and that large birds are less likely to be killed, it is reasonable to conclude that the large size of the birds may make it harder for predators to attack them. Large birds may have physical advantages such as strength, larger wingspan, or longer beaks that enable them to defend themselves more effectively.
2. Other factors unrelated to size may be at play: While the evidence points toward size being a significant factor in the survival rate, there could potentially be other factors that are influencing the outcome. For example, the environment or habitat might be more favorable to larger birds, providing better hiding spots or access to food sources.
Considering the evidence and utilizing logical reasoning, the most credible explanation for the higher rate of survival of the large birds in this scenario is that their larger size may make them harder for predators to attack. However, it's important to recognize that other factors may also contribute, and further investigation or experimentation would help to validate or refute this hypothesis.