can someone help me with this

Which is a narrow, debatable claim?(1 point)

Many students like to use technology when learning.

Standardized test scores are important.

More music education needs to be included in public schools.

Handwriting is still taught in schools.

@PsyDAG whats number 2 pls i need help ive been stuck on this for 3 days now

More music education needs to be included in public schools.

Handwriting is still taught it schools

preferably not the letter because the Language lessons got smart and changed the order of the answers

8. Summarize the important ideas that and reasoning

9. National parks of the population of animal abductions. some national parks have high security so it's really good for the animals to breathe and to be outside in a safe environme
10. School dress code should be rewritten girls should not have to go to school feeling like they can't wear what they want because the dress code states that they're not allowed to be happy and their own skin and wear what makes them happy and the school also says that girls can't wear ripped jeans above the thighs which I don't see a problem with and here's why

To determine which option is a narrow, debatable claim, we need to understand the characteristics of such a claim. A narrow claim is specific and focused on a particular aspect or issue. A debatable claim is one that offers different perspectives and can be argued or challenged.

Let's analyze each option to identify the narrow, debatable claim:

1. "Many students like to use technology when learning."
This statement is not narrow, as it does not focus on a specific aspect or issue. Additionally, it may not be debatable because it's a general observation that technology is popular among students.

2. "Standardized test scores are important."
While this statement is more specific than the first option, it is still not particularly narrow or debatable. The importance of standardized test scores can vary depending on different contexts and viewpoints, but it lacks the specificity needed for a narrow, debatable claim.

3. "More music education needs to be included in public schools."
This statement is more specific and focused on a particular aspect: the inclusion of music education in public schools. It is also debatable because opinions may differ on whether more music education is necessary or beneficial in public schools.

4. "Handwriting is still taught in schools."
Similar to the first two options, this statement is not particularly narrow or debatable. While it focuses on handwriting being taught in schools, it does not delve into specific issues or aspects that could be argued or challenged.

Based on this analysis, option 3, "More music education needs to be included in public schools," is the narrow, debatable claim.