Find the MAP estimator of Θ based on X if Θ∼N(1,1) and W∼N(0,1), and evaluate the corresponding estimate if X=2.
1. No
2. 3/2
3. 2/5
4. 4/13
a. NO
Well, well, well, if we have Θ∼N(1,1) and W∼N(0,1), then we have ourselves a party! Now, we need to find the MAP estimator of Θ based on X.
The MAP (Maximum A Posteriori) estimator, my friend, is obtained by maximizing the posterior probability. In simple words, it's like finding the most likely value for Θ given the observed value of X.
Now, the posterior probability is given by P(Θ|X) ∝ P(X|Θ) * P(Θ), where P(X|Θ) is the likelihood function and P(Θ) is the prior probability of Θ.
Since both Θ and X follow normal distributions, we can use their properties to obtain our MAP estimator.
Now, for our Gaussian friends, we know that the likelihood function for X follows a normal distribution as well, with mean Θ and variance 1.
So, the likelihood function is P(X|Θ) = (2π)^(-1/2) * exp(-(X-Θ)^2 / 2).
The prior probability P(Θ) is also a normal distribution with mean 1 and variance 1.
Now, to find the MAP estimator, we need to maximize the posterior probability. In mathematical terms, we want to find the value of Θ that maximizes P(Θ|X).
Let's do some math magic and simplify things a bit. Taking the logarithm of the posterior probability allows us to convert it into a sum instead of a product. So, log(P(Θ|X)) ∝ log(P(X|Θ)) + log(P(Θ)).
And we all know that maximizing a sum is the same as maximizing the individual terms. So, we need to find the value of Θ that maximizes log(P(X|Θ)) + log(P(Θ)).
With a lot of calculations, my friend, we can find that the MAP estimator of Θ based on X is given by:
Θ_MAP = (X + Σ(1))/(1 + N),
where Σ(1) represents the sum over all the X values, and N is the total number of observations.
So, if we plug in X=2 into our MAP estimator, we get:
Θ_MAP = (2 + Σ(1))/(1 + N).
Now, to evaluate the corresponding estimate, we need the values of Σ(1) and N. Since I don't have that information, I'll have to leave the final evaluation to you, my friend.
But hey, you're one step closer to finding that MAP estimator! Keep crunching those numbers. Good luck!
To find the Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) estimator of Θ based on X, we need to first determine the posterior distribution of Θ given X, and then find the value of Θ that maximizes this distribution.
The posterior distribution is obtained using Bayes' theorem:
P(Θ|X) = (P(X|Θ) * P(Θ)) / P(X)
In this case, we have Θ~N(1,1) (prior distribution) and X follows a normal distribution as well. Given that X=2, we need to calculate P(Θ|X=2).
Let's break down the equation:
P(X|Θ) represents the likelihood of observing X given a specific value of Θ. In this case, X~N(Θ,1), so:
P(X|Θ) = (1/√(2π)) * e^(-0.5 * (X-Θ)^2)
P(Θ) is the prior distribution of Θ, which is given as Θ~N(1,1):
P(Θ) = (1/√(2π)) * e^(-0.5 * (Θ-1)^2)
P(X) is the marginal likelihood of X, which can be obtained by integrating P(X|Θ) * P(Θ) over all possible values of Θ:
P(X) = ∫ [P(X|Θ) * P(Θ)] dΘ
Now, we can substitute these values and calculate the posterior distribution:
P(Θ|X) = [P(X|Θ) * P(Θ)] / P(X)
= [(1/√(2π)) * e^(-0.5 * (X-Θ)^2) * (1/√(2π)) * e^(-0.5 * (Θ-1)^2)] / ∫ [P(X|Θ) * P(Θ)] dΘ
To calculate the MAP estimator, we need to find the value of Θ that maximizes P(Θ|X). Unfortunately, this calculation involves solving an integral, which can be challenging analytically.
However, we can make use of numerical methods or computational tools like software or programming languages to estimate the value of Θ that maximizes the posterior distribution. One common approach is to use a numerical optimization algorithm such as the Newton-Raphson method or the gradient ascent method to find the maximum.
Once we have obtained the MAP estimator of Θ, we can evaluate it by substituting X=2 into the estimator equation.
5/4
2/5
4/20