If objective good means 'always good' and subjective good means 'sometimes good', why might I be inclined to agree with the former over the latter?
Maybe because of the word “always”? But then, I have no real idea what you agree or disagree with. What do YOU think?
I thought the same but I am struggling to expand the answer.
You might start with thorough explanations (definitions) of the words "objective" and "subjective."
www.onelook.com
I have looked through the definitions. Also, could an example of subjective good could be stealing? I posted another question asking for examples of subjective and objective good so I could understand it more. It disappeared somehow.
When it comes to the distinction between objective and subjective good, different individuals may be inclined to agree with one over the other for various reasons. If you find yourself more inclined to agree with objective good meaning 'always good' rather than subjective good meaning 'sometimes good,' here are a few reasons that might explain your inclination:
1. Clarity and Consistency: Objective good provides a clear and consistent moral framework. It allows for a universal standard or set of principles that remain constant regardless of personal opinions or cultural context. This can give a sense of stability and certainty in determining what is morally right or wrong.
2. External Validation: Some people may find comfort in relying on external sources of validation or authority to determine what is good. By accepting objective good, one can appeal to universally accepted principles or divine mandates, reducing the need for individual judgment or personal bias.
3. Objectivity and Impartiality: Objective good is often associated with impartiality, as it implies that moral judgments are not influenced by personal preferences or biases. By adhering to an objective moral standard, one may strive to approach ethical dilemmas with fairness and consider the consequences beyond personal interests.
4. Moral Absolutism: Believing in objective good can align with a moral absolutist perspective, which holds that certain actions are inherently right or wrong, regardless of context or consequences. This perspective may appeal to those seeking a rigid moral framework where there are no exceptions or gray areas.
However, it is essential to remember that ethics and moral reasoning can be complex and nuanced. Different philosophical traditions and ethical theories provide different perspectives on the nature of good and moral value. It is not uncommon for individuals to hold a combination of objective and subjective views depending on the situation or the specific ethical dilemma at hand.