Which of the following did Kentucky and Virginia used to claim that their states had the right to refuse to follow any federal laws they sought to be unconstitutional A.national guard
B. nullification doctrine
C. sedition act
D. supreme court
428 people have seen this and nobody has helped the guy
The correct answer is B. nullification doctrine.
To arrive at this answer, let's break down the options and explain how to eliminate them:
A. The national guard: The national guard is a reserve military force primarily used for domestic emergencies and support in times of war. While it can be used by the states under the command of the governor, it does not specifically relate to the right to refuse federal laws. Therefore, we can eliminate option A.
B. Nullification doctrine: Nullification doctrine refers to the belief that states have the right to nullify or invalidate federal laws that they consider unconstitutional. This doctrine was invoked by both Kentucky and Virginia in response to federal laws that they disagreed with. This option accurately describes the claim made by these states in asserting their right to refuse to follow certain federal laws. Therefore, the answer is B.
C. Sedition Act: The Sedition Act was an act passed by the United States Congress in 1798 to curb criticism of the government during times of war. While this act did limit freedom of speech and press, it does not relate directly to the right of states to refuse federal laws they consider unconstitutional. Therefore, we can eliminate option C.
D. Supreme Court: The Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in the United States and is responsible for interpreting the Constitution and ruling on the constitutionality of laws. While the Supreme Court plays a crucial role in constitutional matters, it does not grant states the right to refuse federal laws. Therefore, we can eliminate option D.
In conclusion, the correct answer is B. nullification doctrine because it accurately represents the claim made by Kentucky and Virginia regarding their right to refuse federal laws they deemed unconstitutional.