Which of the following best explains why a colorful tulip is not typically viewed as a work of art.
A. Tulips cant be displayed in a gallery
B. Tulips are not lasting objects
C. Tulips do not have abstract patterns
D. Tulips are not human made
What do you think?
Um i would say B?
To determine the best explanation for why a colorful tulip is not typically viewed as a work of art, you can analyze the given options:
A. Tulips can't be displayed in a gallery: This option suggests that the reason tulips aren't viewed as art is because they can't be displayed in a gallery. While displaying an object in a gallery is one aspect of classifying it as art, it is not the sole criteria. There are various mediums and forms of art that are not displayed in galleries, such as performance art or installation art. Therefore, this explanation is not the most accurate.
B. Tulips are not lasting objects: This option suggests that tulips are not considered art because they are not lasting objects. One characteristic often associated with art is its longevity and ability to endure over time. Tulips, being a living organism, have a limited lifespan and will eventually wither. The concept of impermanence does play a role in determining what is considered art, but it is not the primary factor.
C. Tulips do not have abstract patterns: This option suggests that tulips do not have abstract patterns, implying that this lack of abstractness makes them not typically viewed as art. While abstract patterns are one style and form of art, art encompasses a wide range of styles, techniques, and subject matters. The absence of abstract patterns does not necessarily exclude an object from being considered art.
D. Tulips are not human-made: This option suggests that tulips are not typically viewed as art because they are not human-made. This explanation aligns with the traditional understanding of art, in which it is often associated with human creativity and expression. Objects that are not made by humans, such as natural landscapes or certain animals, are typically not classified as art. Therefore, this option is the closest to the best explanation.
In conclusion, the best explanation for why a colorful tulip is not typically viewed as a work of art is D. Tulips are not human-made. While all the options provided have some validity, the fact that tulips are not created by humans aligns with the traditional understanding and classification of art.
I disagree.
https://www.google.com/search?ei=i4zQXMuqDYW6sQWShK3QBQ&q=work+of+art+definition&oq=work+of+art+def&gs_l=psy-ab.1.0.0j0i22i30l9.47306.49756..55895...0.0..0.120.444.1j3......0....1..gws-wiz.......0i71j0i67j0i22i10i30.CpoP2BpEbvo