why did setters in the washington area request the formation of the northern territory separate from the oregon territory ?
a) they felt the oregon territory was too big
b) oregons territorial government was strictly regulating trade
c) they objected to oregons anti black laws
d) they wanted to focus the wealth from the logging industry in one area
i think its a or d
It's probably a, although I couldn't find any reference to a Northern Territory.
Be sure to check your reading assignment.
I agree with both of your answers.
To determine the correct answer, let's analyze the provided options:
a) They felt the Oregon Territory was too big: This option suggests that settlers wanted to form a separate territory because they believed that the Oregon Territory was too large. This reason may be plausible as managing a vast territory could pose challenges of governance and administration.
b) Oregon's territorial government was strictly regulating trade: According to this option, settlers wanted a separate territory because they disagreed with Oregon's strict regulations on trade. This reason suggests dissatisfaction with the economic policies of the Oregon Territory.
c) They objected to Oregon's anti-black laws: This option proposes that settlers requested a separate territory due to their disagreement with Oregon's laws that discriminated against black individuals. This reason indicates a social or moral motivation for seeking a separate territory.
d) They wanted to focus the wealth from the logging industry in one area: This option suggests that settlers wanted to concentrate the wealth generated from the logging industry in a specific area, separate from the Oregon Territory. This reason highlights an economic motive for the formation of a separate territory.
Now, let's eliminate the options that seem less likely to be the primary reason:
Option a) "They felt the Oregon Territory was too big" may have played a role, but it is not the primary reason.
Option b) "Oregon's territorial government was strictly regulating trade" may have been a factor, but there is insufficient evidence to suggest it was the main motivation.
Option d) "They wanted to focus the wealth from the logging industry in one area" is a plausible reason, but it does not align with the general complaints of settlers in the Washington area.
That leaves us with option c) "They objected to Oregon's anti-black laws." This answer suggests that the settlers in the Washington area sought a separate territory due to their opposition to Oregon's discriminatory laws. This reason aligns with the historical context of the time when racial tensions and discriminatory practices were prevalent.
Therefore, it is most likely that option c) is the correct answer: Settlers in the Washington area requested the formation of the Northern Territory separate from the Oregon Territory because they objected to Oregon's anti-black laws.
what gave the united states a larger claim than britain to the pacific northwest ?
a) britain was tired of fighting over the area decided to sell it to the united states
b)britain had several trading posts and military forts established throughout the area
c) there were many more valuable resources north of the 49th parallel
d) there were thousands of american settlers living north of the columbia river
i think its d
why was it difficult for settlers to take bulky furniture or heavy household goods with them on the journey west ?
a) every inch of space in the wagon was needed for necessary supplies
b) other travelers resented sharing a load that contained unnecessary items
c) such items were often stolen along the way by other settlers
d) these items made the travelers feel homesick for life in the east
i think its a