Which option most accurately analyzes Stand Watie’s decision to join the Confederate Army?
He believed that the Confederacy’s court system would facilitate Cherokee interests in reclaiming lost territory.
He joined the Confederacy to fight the United States government in retribution for the Indian Removal Act.
He wanted to use Confederate resources to build an outpost in the West that would protect Native American interests.
He sought to incite conflict among Americans in the hopes that he could regain lost Cherokee territory in Georgia.
C?
I think you're right, but check your text.
https://www.history.com/news/who-was-stand-watie
In order to accurately analyze Stand Watie's decision to join the Confederate Army, we need to examine the available options and evaluate their accuracy.
Option A suggests that Watie believed the Confederacy's court system would facilitate Cherokee interests in reclaiming lost territory. To evaluate the accuracy of this option, we could do the following:
1. Research Stand Watie's background and motivations: Studying Watie's history and writings can provide insights into his beliefs and goals.
2. Examine the actions and statements of Stand Watie during the time: Analyzing what Watie said and did during the period when he decided to join the Confederacy can shed light on his intentions.
3. Consult primary and secondary sources: Looking at historical documents, such as letters, official records, and accounts from that era can give us a more accurate understanding of Stand Watie's decision.
After conducting this research, if we find evidence supporting the idea that Stand Watie believed the Confederacy's court system would benefit Cherokee interests in reclaiming lost territory, we can conclude that option A is accurate. However, without further analysis, it is difficult to definitively determine the accuracy of this option.
Therefore, the answer to the question is not clear based solely on the information provided, and further research and analysis would be necessary.