Laws differ form theories because laws do not provide
Laws differ from scientific theories in that they do not posit a mechanism or explanation of phenomena: they are merely distillations of the results of repeated observation. As such, a law is limited in applicability to circumstances resembling those already observed, and may be found false when extrapolated to differing circumstances unrelated to what the law states.
so is the answer " A Explanation "
I think A is the answer
Laws and theories are two different concepts in the context of science and knowledge. Laws are established principles or rules that describe natural phenomena and are based on observations and empirical evidence. They are often expressed as mathematical equations or concise statements. Examples of scientific laws include Newton's laws of motion or the law of conservation of energy.
On the other hand, theories are comprehensive explanations that attempt to provide insight into the underlying causes and mechanisms behind observed phenomena. They go beyond simple observations and provide a framework for understanding and predicting phenomena. Theories are generally based on a wide range of evidence and support from experiments and observations.
One key difference between laws and theories is that laws describe what happens in nature without necessarily explaining why it happens. They are more focused on describing the relationship between different variables or the behavior of phenomena. Theories, on the other hand, aim to explain the underlying mechanisms and concepts behind the observed phenomena.
To get a law, scientists often conduct experiments or make observations to gather data. They analyze this data and look for consistent patterns or trends. Based on these patterns, they can formulate a law that describes the observed relationship between variables. The law is then tested and validated through further experimental verification.
Theories, on the other hand, are developed through a more complex process. They usually start with an initial explanation or hypothesis that attempts to explain a phenomenon. Scientists then gather additional evidence, conduct experiments, and make predictions based on the hypothesis. If the predictions are consistent with further observations and experiments, the hypothesis may evolve into a theory. The theory is continually refined and expanded as more evidence becomes available.
In summary, laws describe what happens in nature in a concise manner, whereas theories provide explanations for why things happen. Laws are derived from observations and experiments, while theories are developed through a more comprehensive and iterative process of hypothesis formulation, evidence gathering, and prediction testing.