Why Is It Important to Beowulf's Image As An Epic Hero That He Faced Grendel Without A Weapon?
A.)Grendel Is The Embodiment Of Evil And Evil Doesn't Fight With A Weapon.
B.)By Giving Up His Sword, Beowulf Showed Both Superior Strength And Superior Ethics As He Made The Fight More Even.
C.) Beowulf Couldn't Use A Sword Because He Was Confused,Which Demonstrated His Ability To Overcome Mental Challenges.
D.)Beowulf Had To Fight With His Hands Because He Didn't Have A Weapon.
I Know In The Story It States That Grendel Had Bewitched All Men's Weapons So They Could Not Harm Him But I Don't Think The Story Is Clear Exactly On Why Beowulf Face Grendel Without A Weapon.
I Choose B But I Think It Could Also Be D Am I Correct?
B is correct.
Thank You
You're welcome.
In the story of Beowulf, it is true that Grendel had bewitched all men's weapons, preventing them from harming him. Beowulf's decision to face Grendel without a weapon is significant to his image as an epic hero.
Option B, "By giving up his sword, Beowulf showed both superior strength and superior ethics as he made the fight more even," is a valid interpretation and explains why it is important to his image as an epic hero. By choosing to face Grendel without a weapon, Beowulf effectively leveled the playing field and demonstrated his immense physical strength. This act showcases his bravery, honor, and code of ethics as an epic hero.
On the other hand, option D, "Beowulf had to fight with his hands because he didn't have a weapon," is technically correct based on the story's context. However, it does not delve into the deeper significance of Beowulf's choice. It solely states the factual reason why Beowulf fought without a weapon.
Therefore, option B is a more comprehensive explanation as it addresses both Beowulf's physical strength and his ethical character, emphasizing why him facing Grendel without a weapon is important to his image as an epic hero.