I have to find a problem with this argument if there is one. Is there a problem with the argument? :
Dr. Jack Kevorkian helped people that were terminally ill. He helped them by ending their suffering by ending their lives the way the patients wanted. The common misconception is that he helps them die, instead, see it as him relieving a patient of their unending suffering and pain. It is also important to remember that it is not Dr. Jack’s wish, it is the patient’s wish. Dr. Jack was an option for people that could not be helped to die peacefully.
The common misconception is that he helps them die, instead, see it as him relieving a patient ....common misconception is the subject of the sentence, but in the see it as him, it does not fit as subject: can common misconception see it as ...? need to rechange the subject, or break into two sentences, rephrasing the "see it as" with a subject that fits.
Now argument: what makes a patients wish moral? If the patient wished death for any others would that be ok? Are we certain the patient is mentally competent? How are you so certain it is not Dr Jack's wish?
The argument presented in the statement seems to support the actions of Dr. Jack Kevorkian and his assistance in ending the lives of terminally ill patients. However, it is important to note that there are several ethical and legal issues surrounding this topic that can be considered problematic.
1. Ethical concerns: Assisting someone in ending their life raises ethical questions, such as the right to die and the sanctity of life. Many ethical frameworks emphasize the importance of preserving life and advocate for alternative measures to relieve pain and suffering, such as palliative care.
2. Legal considerations: In many jurisdictions, euthanasia and assisted suicide are illegal. Therefore, the actions of Dr. Jack Kevorkian could potentially be seen as violating legal boundaries, regardless of the intentions behind them.
3. Patient autonomy: While it is mentioned that the patients have expressed their wish to end their lives, it is important to consider the mental and emotional state of terminally ill individuals. It can be argued that their decision-making capacity might be influenced by depression, fear, or psychological distress stemming from their condition, potentially compromising their ability to make fully informed choices.
4. Slippery slope argument: One concern is that allowing physician-assisted suicide in certain cases could lead to a slippery slope where the criteria for eligibility broadens over time, potentially extending the practice to individuals who may not be facing terminal illnesses or unbearable suffering.
It is crucial to engage in a thorough analysis of the complex issues surrounding this topic before forming a definitive opinion.