7.) What would a world of anarchy be like?

A: A situation of living in nature, harmonious and free
B: A Situation of well-ordered law and order
C: A situation of extended families living together, fighting for resources with other families
D: A situation of conclusion and wild behavior due to a lack of rules*<--[My Answer]*

8.) What is a bright-line rule?

A: A clear general standard upon which new cases may be based*<--[My Answer]*
B: A balance between the common good ad individual freedom, specifically speech
C: A way to interpret the establishment clause of the first amendment
D: A statement of rights due to each citizen

9.) In a situation where the common good trumps individual rights, which phrase is used to describe the rights?

A: Limited Rights
B: Imperfect Rights*<--[My Answer]*
C: Lost Rights
D: Competing Rights

My Answers: (again, this is just to make sure their clearly stated)
7.) D: A Situation of confusion and wild behavior due to lack of rules.
8.) A: A Clear general standard upon which new cases may be based
9.) B: Imperfect Rights

7 & 8, yes

9, no

its competing rights\

just did the test

9. is D

7.) Correct! A world of anarchy would indeed be a situation of confusion and wild behavior due to a lack of rules. Anarchy refers to a society without recognized government or authority, where individuals have complete freedom but also face the consequences of no established order.

To arrive at this answer, you can analyze the meaning of anarchy by breaking down the word itself. Anarchy comes from the Greek word "anarkhia," which means "without rulers." Understanding the root meaning provides insight into the chaotic nature that would exist without rules and system of governance.

8.) Correct! A bright-line rule is indeed a clear general standard upon which new cases may be based. Bright-line rules are specific and unambiguous guidelines or principles that establish a clear boundary and make it easier for people to understand and follow.

To determine the meaning of a bright-line rule, you can break down the term itself. "Bright-line" signifies that the rule is easily visible and easily applied, leaving no room for interpretation or ambiguity. It sets a definitive line that can be consistently referenced to establish consistency and fairness in new situations.

9.) Correct! In a situation where the common good trumps individual rights, the phrase "Imperfect Rights" is used to describe the rights. This means that individual rights are limited or compromised in favor of benefiting the greater community or society as a whole.

To arrive at this answer, you can analyze the implications of the phrase and its relationship to the question. "Imperfect rights" suggests that individual rights are not absolute and may be subject to limitations or modifications for the greater good. It acknowledges that individual rights are not absolute and can be affected by the needs and interests of the collective.

oh, well then then is this right?

9.) A: Limited Rights

Yes, limited rights. :)