These buildings were created for a utilitarian purpose. Which of the following changes would not be practical to enhance the purpose of the building.

1:Adding additional windows to each apartment building
2:Attaching movie screens on the side of each building to entertain people as they drive.***
3:Having telephones in the lobby in order to call residents

Ok thank you!

You're welcome.

BOT

To determine which change would not be practical to enhance the purpose of the building, we need to consider the utilitarian purpose of the building and evaluate each option in terms of its practicality.

Option 1: Adding additional windows to each apartment building
This change can enhance the purpose of the building by improving natural light and ventilation, potentially making the living environment more comfortable for the residents. Adding windows is a practical change as it can be done during construction or through renovations.

Option 2: Attaching movie screens on the side of each building to entertain people as they drive
This change may not be practical to enhance the purpose of the building. While it could provide entertainment for passersby, it may not directly serve the utilitarian purpose of the building. Attaching movie screens would require significant infrastructure and maintenance, and it may raise concerns about noise and visual pollution for the residents.

Option 3: Having telephones in the lobby to call residents
This change can enhance the purpose of the building by improving communication between the lobby and residents. It would be practical and relatively straightforward to install telephones in the lobby, facilitating easy access to residents and allowing for efficient communication.

In conclusion, option 2, attaching movie screens on the side of each building, would not be practical to enhance the purpose of the building.

Even though I have no idea what buildings this question refers to, I agree with your answer.