If the Doctor's office computerized records have been compromised by a hacker, resulting in damages to patients is:
A - The doctor liable if he didn't have proper firewall or other protections.
B - The doctor is not liable.
C - The doctor is liable
D - The risk manager, but not the doctor is liable.
I would say A, but it may ultimately be up to a jury. Do doctors have risk managers? If they did, the Doctor should do the suing of that "manager" if and after losing the case.
To determine the answer to this question, we need to consider the legal principles and responsibilities involved in securing and protecting patient information in a medical practice. The answer may vary based on the jurisdiction and specific circumstances, so it is important to consult with legal professionals in your jurisdiction for a conclusive answer.
In general, doctors have an obligation to protect patient records and maintain their confidentiality. This includes ensuring proper security measures are in place to guard against unauthorized access or data breaches. If the doctor's office computerized records were compromised by a hacker and patient damages occurred, the doctor could potentially be held liable if they failed to implement reasonable security measures such as firewalls or other protections.
Based on this reasoning, the most appropriate answer in this case would be:
A - The doctor liable if he didn't have proper firewall or other protections.
It is important to note that this answer is provided based on general legal principles, and the actual liability will depend on the specific circumstances, legal jurisdiction, and applicable laws governing the protection of patient information. It is advisable to consult with legal professionals for a more comprehensive analysis and understanding of the legal obligations and liabilities involved in such situations.