A petition to change public policy is likely to be an example of ________________ argumentation. (Points : 1)
Classic
Consensual
classic
I agree.
To determine the likely type of argumentation that a petition to change public policy represents, we need to understand the purpose and nature of a petition.
A petition is a formal written request, typically signed by many people, to take a specific action or to express a particular viewpoint. Its primary goal is to influence and bring about change in public policy. Therefore, a petition is an example of persuasive argumentation.
Now, let's break down the options given:
1. Classic argumentation: Classic argumentation refers to the presentation of reasoned evidence and logical reasoning to support a particular position. While a petition may contain elements of classic argumentation, it is not specifically indicative of this type of argumentation, as petitions often rely more on collective public support and emotional appeals rather than purely logical reasoning.
2. Consensual argumentation: Consensual argumentation focuses on finding common ground and building consensus among various parties. While a petition seeks to gather support and influence public opinion, it does not necessarily aim to build consensus between different perspectives. Petitions often reflect a specific viewpoint or agenda and may be at odds with other viewpoints.
Based on these explanations, it is more likely that a petition to change public policy represents persuasive argumentation rather than classic or consensual argumentation.