Project Management

Case Study: The Dulhasti Power Plan

Begun in 1985, the Dulhasti Power project, set in the northern Indian provinces of Jammu and Kashmir, represents an example of a disaster in project cost estimation and delivery. As initially conceived, the project’s cost was estimated at 1.6 billion rupees (about $50 million). By the time the contract was let, the cost estimates had risen to 4.5 billion rupees and later successively to 8, 11, 16, and 24 billion rupees (nearly $750 million). As of 2004, the project has still not been completed, although well over $1 billion has been spent pursuing it.

The project was based on a straightforward concept: Dilhasti was designed as a 390MW hydroelectric power plant to be built on the swift-flowing Chenab River in the Doda region, a rugged, mountainous section of the Himalayas, and several hundred kilometers form larger cities. The project sought to build a dam, erect a hydroelectric generating station, and string hundreds of miles of transmission lines starting near the headwaters of a system of rivers flowing onto the plain south of the mountain region. When the contract was awarded at a price of $50 million, the contracting organizations anticipated that the project could be completed in a reasonable time frame.

The contract for the power generation project was first awarded to a French consortium, who almost immediately asked for an upward price revision. The Indian government refused, suspecting that the French consortium has known all along that their initial bid was too low and were hoping to simply “buy” the project prior to renegotiating. The government’s refusal to revise their price resulted in a second bidding process. Because of wider competition from other European countries now in the field, the second, accepted French offer was then even lower than their earlier one. Although this process initially appeared to save the Indian government money, it was not a good beginning to the partnership between the government and the French consortium.

Situated in the mountainous region of the Jammu and Kashmir provinces, the site was intended to capitalize on the proximity to large river systems capable of providing the water capacity needed to run a hydroelectric plant of Dulhasti’s dimensions. Unfortunately, the site selected for the project came with some serious drawbacks as well. Pakistan and India. Jammu and Kashmir have been the epicenter of numerous and serious clashes between separatist forces supported by the Pakistan government and Indian army units stationed in the region to keep the peace. Constructing such an obvious target as a power plant in the disputed area was sure to provoke reaction by nationalist groups, using terrorism as their chief means of opposition. Thus, the additional costs of providing security to the site quickly become prohibitively expensive. A second problem concerns the sheer geographical challenge of creating a large plant in a region almost totally devoid of supporting infrastructure, including an adequate logistics network (roads and rail lines). Building the plant in the foothills of the Himalayas may be scenic, but it is not cost effective, particularly as almost all supplies had to be brought in with air transportation, at exorbitant costs. All raw materials, including cement, wood, stone, and steel, had to be hauled by helicopter for miles over snowbound areas.

The work on the plant continued in fits and starts for over 15 years. By the turn of the century, over $1 billion had been spent on the Dulhasti project and the plant is still not operational. Further, in order to offset the expense of the project, the cost of power to be generated by the plant has risen by over 500%, making the plant an inefficient producer of electrical power for the countryside. The original French-led consortium that contracted to develop the plant has pulled out, forcing the Indian government to rebid it and award the contract to a Norwegian firm.

What is the status of the project to date? Still unfinished, the budget continues to be revised upward in hopes that the project will come on line by late 2005. A recent government report, including an evaluation of the project’s current status, suggests that key elements of the project are less than 50% completes and will require yet another upward revision of the budget for Dulhasti, perhaps to a much as $1.6 billion. The project’s end is still not in sight, form either a completed power plant or budgetary perspective.


and answer the following questions:

1. Explain the challenge of delivering accurate cost estimation when working in harsh geographical conditions.

2. The original bidding process favored the lowest project construction bids using a "fixed price" contract. What are the advantages and disadvantages to the Indian government when using this type of bidding process?

3. How did it contribute to gross underbids and successive cost escalations?

  1. 👍 0
  2. 👎 0
  3. 👁 137
asked by animal
  1. Animal, when you have answered these as best you can, please repost and someone here will be happy to give you suggestions and let you know where you need to make corrections.

    =)

  2. I need these answers badly

    1. 👍 0
    2. 👎 0
    posted by Gerry
  3. thr regian had too many wars

    1. 👍 0
    2. 👎 0
  4. How did it contribute to gross underbids and successive cost escalations?

    1. 👍 0
    2. 👎 0
    posted by Dianna
  5. How did it contribute to gross underbids and successive cost escalations

    1. 👍 0
    2. 👎 0
    posted by Teresa
  6. How did it contribute to gross underbids and successive cost escalations

    1. 👍 0
    2. 👎 0
    posted by Niki

Respond to this Question

First Name

Your Response

Similar Questions

  1. Economics

    If CPI was 108 in 1985 and 130 in 1990 (base year 1982-1984 = 100) -the purchasing power of the dollar would have been the same in 1985 and 1990. -the purchasing power of the dollar in 1985 would have been greater. -the purchasing

    asked by Evan on September 20, 2009
  2. Vista Laptop Help

    Okay so I'd do this myself but I only have a desktop with Windows Vista and not a laptop so if anyone with a laptop that has Vista on it could please help me: 1. Open Windows Mobility Center and then mute the speakers. 2. Change

    asked by Cody on November 8, 2009
  3. Pre-Algebra

    1)(6.0 × 10 to the 5th power) × (3.0 × 10 to the 4th power) A) 18 × 10 to the 20th power. B) 18 × 10 to the 9th power. C) 1.8 × 10 to the 20th power. D) 1.8 × 10 to the 9th power. 2)(5 × 10 to the -2 power) ÷ (2 × 10 to

    asked by Audrey on September 11, 2018
  4. History

    Which of the following powers is shared by presidents in both Russia and the United States? A:the power to declare war. B:the power to pass legislation C:the power to set policy by decree D:the power to choose a second in

    asked by marylyn on May 2, 2018
  5. math help pls pls pls

    Choose the correct simplification of the expression the quantity a to the 2nd power over b to the 3rd power all raised to the 4th power. A. a to the 6th power over b to the 7th power B. b^12 C. a^8b^15 D. the quantity a to the 8th

    asked by Oscar on March 21, 2016
  6. Social Studies

    Did the Marbury v. Madison case affect the power of the judicial branch by helping establish the Supreme Courts' power to check the power of the other branches of the government?

    asked by Peeps on May 11, 2014
  7. Math

    Hey, I just need my answer checked. Simplify: y to the 4th power times y to the 3rd power y to the 1st power y to the 7th power ** y to the 12th power y to the 43rd power correct? If not, please show work for me. thanks.

    asked by IAmNotARobotTrustMe1 on September 6, 2017
  8. Social Studies

    My son has to write a paragraph for a Social Studies project. The paragraph should include a "Power 1 statement at the beginning and end of the paragraph and at least three Power 2 statements. Eache Power 2 statement should be

    asked by Mom on October 15, 2006
  9. physics

    The disk shaped head of a pin is 1.0 mm in diameter. Which of the following is the best estimate of the number of atoms in the layer of atoms on the top of the surface of the pinhead? 1. 10 to the 34th power 2. 10 to the 19th

    asked by Kailey on August 26, 2010
  10. algerbra

    how do i set up and whats the prosedure to solve 10 to the 7th power times 10 to the third power divided by 10 to the 4th power times ten to the negitive 9the power? please help you are doing mankind a favor.if i don't pass this i

    asked by andytrfmn on February 20, 2008

More Similar Questions