what is the difference between pseudo psychologies?
This site may help you define pseudo psychologies -- check near the end of the presentation.
http://academic.kellogg.cc.mi.us/talbots/Course%20docs/Telecourse/201%20chapter1%20PP.ppt#256,1,Chapter 1 Introducing Psychology and Research Methods
Here are some other articles that might help:
http://www.members.cox.net/dagershaw/lol/Coincidence.htm
http://www.members.cox.net/dagershaw/lol/PsychPseudo.html
I hope this helps a little more. Thanks for asking.
Wrong
To understand the difference between various pseudo psychologies, it's important to first understand what pseudo psychologies are. Pseudo psychologies are often regarded as unscientific or non-evidence-based beliefs and practices that masquerade as legitimate psychology. They lack empirical evidence, rely on unfounded claims, and often lack rigorous scientific scrutiny.
There are several examples of pseudo psychologies, each with its own characteristics and distinctions. Some commonly known pseudo psychologies include:
1. Astrology: Astrology suggests that celestial bodies and their positions have an influence on human behavior and personality traits. However, no scientific evidence supports this claim, and astrology is generally considered a pseudoscience.
2. Phrenology: Phrenology was popular in the 19th century and claimed that personality traits and mental abilities could be determined by examining the shape and size of bumps on the skull. However, phrenology has been debunked and is not supported by modern neuroscience.
3. Graphology: Graphology, also known as handwriting analysis, purports to determine personality traits based on an individual's handwriting style. However, scientific research has consistently refuted its validity.
4. Psychic Phenomena: Psychic phenomena, such as clairvoyance and telekinesis, claim to involve extrasensory perception or the ability to communicate with supernatural forces. Despite extensive research, no credible scientific evidence has been found to support these claims.
5. Recovered Memory Therapy: This approach, often associated with traumatic experiences or abuse, claims to help individuals recover repressed memories. However, it has been widely discredited due to the potential for the suggestion of false memories and the lack of empirical evidence supporting the accuracy of recovered memories.
To differentiate between these pseudo psychologies, it is important to critically assess their claims and examine the supporting evidence. Look for scientific research and consensus within the psychological community. Valid and reliable psychological theories and practices are based on empirical evidence and rigorous scientific testing.