Calculating Probability
Perl – Think Again
To tackle mathematical problems with conditional probabilities, math buffs rely on Bayes' formula or discrete distributions, generated by short Perl scripts.
Features
The Monty Hall problem is loved by statisticians around the world [1]. You might be familiar with this puzzle, in which a game show host offers a contestant a choice of three doors – behind one door is a prize, but the other two doors only reveal goats. After the contestant chooses a door, the TV host opens a different door, revealing a goat, and asks the candidate to reconsider (Figure 1). Who would have thought that probabilities in a static television studio could change so dramatically just because the host opens a door without a prize?
The human brain seems to struggle with conditional probabilities like these, which describe random events with preconditions. It's just like a task I set up in a Perl column 15 years ago, which involved a top hat with three cards inside. The first card is black on both the front and back, the second card is red on front and back, and the third card red on one side and black on the other (Figure 2). One card is drawn. You can see the front, which is red. What is the probability of the back of the card also being red?
Counterintuitive
Most people immediately respond "50 percent," because there are apparently two equally probable cases: the redandblack card and the redandred card – that is, the opposite side is black in one case and red in the other case. To many people's surprise, however, the correct answer is "66 percent." The clue lies within the preconditions of the experiment: The redandred card is drawn twice as often in comparison to the redandblack one, because it meets the precondition of the experiment – one side is red – on both sides, whereas the redandblack card only gets drawn onethird of the time.
More than 250 years ago, the mathematician Thomas Bayes tried to express such intuitively errorprone problems in an immutable formula. The Bayes' theorem [2] describes in its "diachronic interpretation" how the probabilities of hypotheses change over time, as you encounter new data in an experiment. The formula
P(HD) = P(H) × P(DH)/P(D)
defines the probability P of a hypothesis H, for example, "I have drawn the redandred card," under the condition of newly emerging data D, such as "The front of the drawn card is red" (Figure 3).
On the righthand side of the equation you see P(H), the probability of the hypothesis, before new data become available. Bayes multiplies it by P(DH), that is, the probability that the data are available under the hypothesis. How likely is it, for example, that the person drawing the cards actually will see a red front if they have drawn the redandred card?
The denominator on the right side, P(D), is the probability of the available data, independent of any hypothesis. How likely is it that the candidate will see a red front after drawing any card?
Clever Bayes
All three possible hypotheses – randomly drawn cards – are obviously equally likely in this experiment. In other words, P(H) – the probability that the redred card is drawn – is equal to 1/3, because it is drawn in one third of all cases. Assuming this hypothesis, the flip side of the drawn redred card is trivially also red in exactly 100 percent of all cases; that is, P(DH) = 1.
Regardless of the hypothesis of one drawn card, the probability of seeing a red card surface after drawing is 50 percent, that is, P(D) = 1/2. After all, there are six card sides in the hat, three of which are red, and three black. If you substitute this into the Bayesian formula, the result for P(HD) is thus 1/3 × 1/(1/2) = 2/3. Thus, the formula predicts the experimentally demonstrable correct result of 66 percent and contradicts our intuition.
Probability, Discretely Programmed
Think Bayes [3], which was published about six months ago, not only explains the Bayesian formula but also describes a numerical method that is easy to use for experiments with short software programs. To do this, you store the hypotheses as statistical distributions, that is, in a Python dictionary or Perl hash, along with their probabilities.
As additional data becomes available, the stored values are then multiplied by the conditional probability of the incoming data, under the assumption that the individual hypothesis is true. Later, the program normalizes all values so that they add up to 1, or 100 percent.
The result is the probability of all hypotheses in the light of the incoming data. This process and specifically the final normalizing step can only be used, however, if:
 not more than one of the hypotheses is true, and
 there are no other options; that is, at least one of the hypotheses is true.
Listing 1 [4] shows the implementation of the cards
script, which prints the correct solution, 0.666. It uses the Distrib.pm
module (Listing 2), which provides auxiliary functions for computing the statistical distribution. The probabilities for the hypotheses of drawing different cards (BB
, BR
, RR
for blackblack, blackred, redred) are fed to the module in lines 79, each with a value of 1/3.
Listing 2
Distrib.pm
Listing 1
cards
Lines 1113 of Listing 1 define the incoming data (i.e., the probabilities that the front sides of the drawn cards are red) for each hypothesis and multiply the supplied hypothesis values by them. Thus, the probability of the subject seeing a red front on the blackblack card is zero. The probability is 50 percent for the blackred card, depending on which way the card faces coming out of the hat. The redred card shows red in 100 percent of all cases, which is why line 13 sets the multiplier to a value of 1
.
Finally, the call to the prob("RR")
method returns the normalized probability of the hypothesis redred card, which is 2/3.
Buy this article as PDF
(incl. VAT)
Buy Linux Magazine
Direct Download
Read full article as PDF:
Price $2.95
News

KDE Plasma Developers Introduce a GNOMELike Overview
A new overview effect makes it easier for users to interact with both Plasma Activities and Virtual Desktops.

Rocky Linux 8.5 Now Available with Secure Boot Support
The latest iteration of CentOS alternative, Rocky Linux has arrived and includes numerous updates as well as support for Secure Boot.

System76 Developing a New Desktop Environment
The makers of Pop!_OS are currently in the early stages of creating a brand new, nonGNOME, desktop environment.

Hetzner Opens New Location in the USA
The Hetzner costeffective Cloud solution has arrived in the United States to offer cloud servers that offer solid performance without a high price.

KDE Plasma 5.24 Introduces Fingerprint Reader Support
The next release of the KDE Plasma desktop environment will include support for fingerprint readers for session authentication and more.

Ubuntu 21.10 Released and Finally Includes Gnome 40
The most anticipated update to Ubuntu is finally here and the workflow couldn't be better.

Linux Can Now Run on Apple’s M1 Chipset
Linux users looking to take advantage of Apple Silicon are about to get their wish with the M1 chipset.

MX Linux 21 RC Candidate Available For Testing
The MX Linux development team has released the RC images for MX Linux 21 for testing purposes.

Fedora 35 is Shaping Up to Be an Impressive Release
Although the beta version of Fedora’s upcoming release is behind schedule, the Linux distribution is still slotted for October and will include numerous bug fixes and some exciting new features.

Canonical Extends Support For Ubuntu 14.04 and 16.04
The company behind Ubuntu offered a muchneeded lifeline to those who still depend on older versions of the opensource operating system.